Monday 31 December 2007

Changes in Bird Behaviour

In the last week I posted about a pair of Robin that had nested, in winter, down in Bedfordshire. While it would be nice to imagine that with the milder winters we are getting as a result of a changing climate, unfortunately what is the determining factor for the survival of the chicks is food. Each parent would need to find 35g of insects that’s about one and half ounces of insects to keep the chicks and themselves alive and for the chicks to build up body mass. Further, the RSPB, whose headquarters are in Sandy in Bedfordshire, also say that unless the parents could find enough grubs or caterpillars then the chicks would die of dehydration. As the chicks need the juicy bodies of these foods to supply their liquids.

While this Robin is an extreme example, part of the reason for the decline in British song birds is that climate change is causing many birds to nest earlier and before the insects hatch, therefore before the food is their to feed the chicks.

The change in the climate is effecting the behaviour of other birds. In the South West of England, Somerset, Devon and Cornwall birds like Blackcap and other warblers have for the last ten years dispensed with migration and are eking out a living in and around the sewage works. They are there because of the insects, mainly tiny flies, which breed and feed there. Not having to fly all the way to the Mediterranean means that they have reasonable fat reserves to make it through a mildish winter. However, any harsh cold snap has reduced the numbers of these non-migrating birds.

Also on the subject of bird behaviour, over the last week or so I have had the privilege of observing a red kite that has been hunting a few hundred yards from my office stroke back bedroom window. Today I went out to see if I could get some pictures. On time the Red Kite turned up. While watching I realised that there was a specific reason for the Kite quartering the area. The resent heavy rains has flooded out many small mammals, I saw a couple of dead voles too. Further while watching I saw a sparrow hawk fly other. I didn’t get any pictures, as I had forgotten the recharged batteries, no images but great memories.



Beyond a Silent Spring – A New Years Wish


When Rachael Carson wrote her book, many of the effects that she predicted didn’t happen because action was taken. When a hole was discovered in the Ozone layer of the atmosphere, we were fortunate as it was located at the South Pole, and while it will take fifty to seventy-five more years to heal, it is healing as action was taken to stop that pollution.

However, the difficulty we all face now with Climate Change is that we are not prepared to stop the pollution. Even if we stopped burning all fossil fuels today, the effects of what we have burnt already will not stop for two hundred years.

This is why Climate Change is the greatest challenge that humanity faces, the biggest threat to our existence, much greater than Terrorism or any natural disaster.

The examples of DDT and its effects upon the environment and those of CFCs are apt as the solution found was to ban them. Yet while this is eventually what we need to do with using Fossil fuels, what needs to occur now is that we use them to built new methods of sustainable energy production.

The real problem with DDT was that it was used irresponsibly. If users had just used the insecticide as instructed then it would have remained effective. But some people over used it, so that it built up in the environment and impacted upon other species, fish and birds. Or people used it in a weaker solution to make it go further. That caused resistance for the chemical to build up in some agricultural pests. Therefore more and more of the chemical was used, polluting the environment and more importantly the food chain.

Had the manufactures been more careful about ensuring that it was used sensibly, and not tried to maximise sales and profits by tacitly encouraging over use, it could well be that this effective chemical would be available today to deal with malaria carrying mosquitoes and Blue Tongue carrying Midges.

It is the same with CFCs a very effective refrigerant, but again manufacturers wanted more sales and greater profits so it went into every aerosol product you could think of.

We were lucky as the hole the CFCs made happened at the South Pole and at the equator, as deaths would have occurred in the millions before we ever knew what was going on. Had CFCs just been kept as a refrigerant, we would have some very energy efficient refrigerators and air conditioners.

The difficulty we need to overcome is our thinking on climate changing gasses is to adjust our attitude towards the environment. There is nothing we can do to stop the effects of a changing climate; we have already emitted more than enough CO2 in to the atmosphere to seriously damage our planet.

That change in attitude primarily means that we need to drastically reduce our use of fossil fuels. By burning them we are releasing Carbon that our planet locked away millions of years ago. Had that not happened we would not have evolved. Further, if we don’t change we will (Humans) become an evolutionary footnote in our biological record.

That is not just the obvious uses of energy, heating and lighting but all the hidden energy that arises from manufactured goods. That means not changing or upgrading consumer goods. If something needs to be replaced why not buy second hand? Or something refurbished?

Buy your food locally, shipping costs obviously are adding to the price as well as the carbon burnt to get that food to you. Equally why not get together with your neighbours so that only one shopping trip is made for three or four homes. Instantly you can reduce the cost to the environment by a quarter.

However, the real change that needs to happen is to start building or installing other means of power generation, wind turbines, Solar even geo-thermal. It will cost money, but if this doesn’t happen now none of us will have energy at all. The increase in Sea levels will flood oil terminals and ports hampering or even preventing the distribution of fossil fuels will force us into an energy famine.

Further, we need to force our governments to start cooperating and build sustainable power stations. We already have the technology to do this, but all governments balk at the idea of giving away expensive advanced technology. Further, because this would aid developing nations, all the developed nations hate the idea of advancing another countries economy. Yet, they fail to see the larger picture. By helping countries in North Africa as an example, to build solar power stations, photovoltaic and mirror farms, we enable them to get out of poverty. That will stop the economic migration from these nations and will stop the poverty that feeds into extremism, violence and terrorism.

One of the lessons that we learnt in the UK from the terrorism in Northern Ireland was that poor education and poverty fed the prejudices that spawned the violence. Equally NGOs (Non Governmental Organisations) have for years known that helping educate people, especially women helped resolve many of the problems in the world. That is why I despair at the attitude of the American Government who link aid to the direct financial and trade benefits of the US. Other countries do this too but the US is most blatant. Yet by aiding these developing countries to generate power from natural sustainable recourses, we can stop the problems of poverty, health and famine.

We can do this and it could all be done in twenty-five years. The technology exists, and by fairly distributing the know how and recourses around the world we can eliminate almost all the Carbon pollution around the world. Further, we can stop the poverty that leads to conflict.

I know that most people that read this will think that this is an unrealistic dream, but it is my wish for this coming year and for many years to come.







Sunday 30 December 2007

The Christmas Robin



Just before Christmas I heard about a Robin, in Bedfordshire that had nested. Further, it was expected that the clutch of eggs that this pair had laid would hatch on Christmas Day. While this was being reported as an “Ahh” Story, it really is not that at all, as if the eggs hatch the parents will not be able to find the food the chicks need to survive.

As the chicks require a high protein diet of insects, particularly of grubs and caterpillars to build up body mass, these chicks will starve. At other times of the year it would be possible to supplement their food by providing Mealworms, even that option is not available.

It is just another tragic example of a changing climate.





Wednesday 26 December 2007

Beaver Reintroductions in the UK


Back in the autumn I talked about the possibility of Beavers being reintroduced into the British ecosystem. This triggered by the BBC showing images of beavers on the Autumn watch programme. Following that I started looking at the effects of reintroductions.

It is important to distinguish between introductions, a species that is not native but is introduced either deliberately or accidentally, and generally damages the environment and eco systems. Where as a reintroduction is a species that used to be a part of the ecology but has disappeared for some reason, and is reintroduced to rebalance habitat. Locally red Kites were reintroduced as an example, and are thriving. As I write, I can see a Red Kite to the north of my Village out of my window. The impact of them back in the environment is having a real benefit. As they are predominantly carrion feeders, the Kites are removing items that previously had been attracting rats and it seems that having the kites is helping to reduce the numbers of these vermin.

Therefore, reintroductions do create a positive impact for the environment. In the case of the Red Kite it has been an unexpected reduction in the numbers of rats, as well as providing a boost to the economy via tourism. For example there is one particular pub where it’s possible to sit in the beer garden and watch these magnificent birds.

However, it is the benefits to the eco system that is most amazing. In Yellowstone National Park in America, the reintroduction of the wolf aided the habitat, and in surprising ways. One of the effects was that Aspen trees and the willows started to regenerate. This was because the wolf is the top predator and the numbers were sufficient to affect the behaviour of the Elk who were browsing on the shoots of the trees. By the wolfs being their the Elk were keeping to the open and the hills where they could observe the wolfs. That was stopping the Elk from constantly nibbling off the shoots from the trees thus allowing the trees to regenerate. Further, this benefits animals like Beavers who rely on the willow for food. Additionally, the extra ground is benefiting a whole range of other species too.

It has always been known that the presence of top predators is a good indicator of a healthy habitat. But what is a new discovery here is that just how important they are to the health of the whole chain of life in a biosphere.

With the plan to reintroduce Beavers in Scotland there will be great benefits too. At the moment conservation organisations have to invest a lot of time and money in coppicing trees at the waters edge, this the beavers will do naturally for food and to build their homes. Further, in places like Germany where they have already been reintroduced the Beavers have seriously knocked back invasive species like Himalayan Balsam that is choking out native species of plant life. Therefore, I cannot see any disadvantages to this reintroduction programme.

In addition to this reintroduction, I also understand that on another Scottish Estate a breeding pair of Elk have been reintroduced as part of a long term plan that could see another colony of Beavers reintroduced along with Wolf and Lynx. While I personally feel that this would benefit the environment, I can see objections to this and careful preparation work would need to be done, especially education. So I watch and wait.






Americas Bali Road Map to Inaction

The day after agreeing to the Bali Road Map for tackling Climate Change, America and especially the White House started backing off from the agreement. My reaction to that was one of puzzlement. If the US government didn’t agree with or want to be a part of the solution then why sign up?

Further, during the extension of the negotiations it did look as though the US were going to block an agreement. It became clear that the US was isolated and while on minor details America did have its supporters, the overwhelming feeling was that the US were trying to prevent agreement.

Then something rather curious happened. The Dutch Diplomat and Chief negotiator, Yvo De Boer came to the podium and after deigning that the secretariat had been involved in secret and separate talks he broke down and was lead off stage in tears.

Then the most curious aspect was that all of a sudden Paula Dobrianski under secretary of state and the US representative, said that America would join in and follow the majority, that’s the rest of the world as the US were indeed isolated.

I can now report what actually happened. The US had no intention of signing up to any agreement on climate change, well nothing that would be meaningful of effective. Further, in Bali the US were effectively trying to scupper any agreement by holding secret talks with other nations. It was only when the US were discovered doing this that the American delegation agreed to sign up to the Bali Road Map. That is why the Bush administration is calling foul and trying to avoid its responsibility.

The reality is that the US under Bush will do nothing to curb CO2 or take climate change seriously. While the US Government is saying that Climate Change is real it is doing so reluctantly. Additionally, while Americans are the greatest polluters of our planet, even the very weak energy bill that the president has just signed into law is woefully weak. Even the Chinese are implementing measures that are more effective than the US.

I suspect that the US is attempting to create the illusion of tackling the problem, while in reality it will be business as usual. Eventually this inaction by American will end up causing America real pain.

One of the conundrums of climate change is the simple fact that as the planet is warming more water vapour has been released into the atmosphere. As has been shown with Hurricane Katrina and the flooding that occurred in the UK this year, eventually that water will fall as rain. Further, the atmosphere has been retaining more water vapour than any of the computer models were ever predicting. Apart from the fact that this is speeding up the warming of the planet, current thinking is that at some point in the Weather/Climate cycle most of this extra moisture will be released in sudden and violent downpours. Not in areas normally affected by flooding but in places that monsoon type rains would not normally happen. Therefore just on the basis of landmass, America will be hard hit. It is just an event that the models are predicting like the snowstorms that have hit America. The inaction of the Bush government is impacting the population of America.




Tuesday 25 December 2007

Something Fun for Christmas

Well it looks as though I need to apologise to all the children around the world. Last night I decided I would bag myself some venison and I knew that if I waited I would spot them flying over, quite easy to spot as there is a red glow just ahead of the heard. Well I took my shot and unfortunately I only got a rotund guy in a red suit.

So I need to apologise as a lot of parcels and packages didn’t get delivered last night and I will not be eating the venison I wanted either.

Have a good Day


Sunday 23 December 2007

Old Friends and New Beginnings

When I was younger and worked in the photographic industry, I worked for a company that carried out the photo processing services for The British Antarctic Survey. Via this work as well as getting to see many amazing images, I got to know a couple of the scientists who lived in this frozen wilderness. There were times when talking to these people when I really did think that in their hands that part of the planet was safe.

However as can happen, I lost touch. Then in the last couple of months something remarkable happened, the husband of one of the people I knew then, recognised my descriptions of watching badgers in Epping Forest, and realised who I am. So he emailed me.

Yesterday, I had a rather nice lunch with her and as well as catching up on what has happened in our lives but it also emerges that she was in Bali for the Climate Change conference. One interesting fact that I gleaned was that one of the NGOs were making a “Fossil of the Day” award to the delegate who was being most obstructive. I wonder what country won that one?

One important commitment we made, apart from a commitment to stay in touch, was that she is going to take me whale watching, she is involved in a project monitoring citations. So I will have to get my sea legs out of the cupboard.

While it was great to catch up with an old friend, it was also disheartening to hear just how much the climate is affecting the habitat that is Antarctica.

Although I am looking forward and I was able to run my current idea past her. I have been thinking of trying to record some of the sounds of the wildlife that I encounter. One of the aspects of watching wildlife that people, who do their nature watching from an armchair, is just how much noise animals can make. Often when out watching, or trying to watch is a more accurate description, the badgers I have a symphony of sounds around me. Owls calling, the sounds of the badgers snuffling in the earth, even mice and voles make sounds as they are moving about. Thus, I have been looking at recording some of the sounds.

However, I just didn’t know how to do it. Therefore, I went to another friend to learn what I would need to do. I discover that it need not be that expensive either. Therefore I have already started obtaining some of the equipment I will need. While this will not be happening just yet, I am thinking of producing a monthly Podcast with news and stuff regarding Natural History and Wildlife watching. My friend said that she was willing to be interviewed for one or two of them.

So while I thought this last year had been busy, I guess that I will be kept even busier in the coming year.



Friday 21 December 2007

Protecting the Vulnerable


Back in the spring, I don’t know if you can remember that far back, I had the rare opportunity to see a pair of Hen Harriers as they tried to establish a nest in one of the felled areas in my local wood. I was surprised to see them and knowing how rare they are, I contacted the RSPB. Unfortunately in no time at all the birds abandoned the nest and site because of disturbance.

However, less than a week later I received a telephone call telling me that the pair I had seen trying to nest were nesting again. Further, I was asked if I wanted to help protect and guard the nest. Under strict rules of secrecy that would make the government jealous (Especially HMRC), I started aiding the effort that was staged to safeguard the nesting pair. Even before posting this I had to get permission to say anything.

Eventually the Hen Harriers raised five chicks and made the experience of being in the cold and wet of summer worthwhile. However, this is all just background to what happened today. During my stint as slave to the birds, I met a chap who does more than watch the birds, he often takes in injured or sick birds of pray. Further as he helps police and animal charities with gathering evidence of wildlife crimes, I can’t say too much about him other than he is an amazing man.

Anyway, while on my guard duty, we talked about the problems of protecting wildlife and he acknowledged he was sad that because of the attitudes of many in our society, we couldn’t disclose the locations of rare nests etc, because of the few that are determined to destroy beauty. It was encouraging to hear him, as I am always worried about talking about the wildlife I encounter in case some of the oafs who would harm it read my postings too. But he assured me that the more that the lovers of diverse fellow inhabitants of this planet know of what’s out there and why we need to protect them, the less opportunities the brainless ones will have to destroy habitats and individuals.

Well yesterday I got a telephone call from him, did I want to do something really special? I jumped at the chance. So up and out before even the milkman arrives, I was taken to a secret location with two Tawny owls that had been nursed back to fitness. They had been injured by either a shotgun or an air rifle, and had not been able to fly.

So I got the chance to handle a wild owl and with a mixture of delight and regret, I saw this owl fly off and disappear into the trees.





Tawny Owl




Living in a Food Desert

Yesterday morning I went into Consett on the free bus that the big supermarket chain provides to do the last of my shopping for Bah Humbug day. As I stood waiting for the bus the milky disk of the sun was just about visible through the clouds that blanketed my village, and I mused on the problems of the lack of decent food shopping locally. While in the village there are food shops, we even have a post office but for how much longer I don’t know. The problem seems to be that very few people actually cook anymore.

I know that I have been greeted by awe and amazement when I have told people that I can cook. Further, as I have provided friends in and around the Village with samples like Chutneys or Soups, they discover that I really can cook.

Therefore I realise that while I may want decent fresh ingredients, I am in a minority. Most people in the village buy on price and seem to relish the high fat, highly processed food that is available.

Even when I returned to the village and went to get the fresh Fruit and Vegetables from the green grocer in the village, I was disappointed by the fare that was on offer. Often the produce there is less than its best. The difficulty they have is that people will not buy anything unusual, nor will they buy the best in the market as anything cheep, no matter how poor quality, will sell.

I wish that I had a Farmers Market near by, but while they do exist, they are only in the most affluent areas.

Well at least I got my Organic Duck for Humbug Day, so while it may feel as though I live in a food desert, I will be able to feast like a prince.





Monday 17 December 2007

Ramblings


As my postings here have been dealing with some serious issues, I thought I would be a bit more light hearted today and share a picture that I took early in the morning the other week. While I know that not everyone who reads this Blog agrees with me about how serious climate change is, one of my regular “tormentors” who must be local and knows me, did try to moderate his language in one comment sent to me. But even as I tried to edit out the F and C words I realised that it was just incomprehensible. I know that the person must be local as he, and I am presuming it’s a he, called me a “Long Haired Freak”. If he weren’t local how would he know that I was a freak?

On the news today I heard that another set of data has been “Mislaid” by another government department. I was trying to chop some vegetables when this came on the radio and the spokesman from the government that had come along to defend, I am not sure if that’s the right word, the government gloried in the title of Minister for Data Sharing and Protection. I had to stop preparing the vegetables as I was laughing so much, he had obviously got the sharing part off to an art form, it’s just the protection that needs a bit more work.

I had no sooner gone back to cooking when I heard that an Italian has been appointed as Manager for the English Football team and his first job will not be to sort out the players, or anything like that, but to learn English! Something he plans to do in a month! Now I know bugger all about football or any sport for that matter, but I would have thought that having a manager who can communicate in the player’s language was a pre requisite.

I had wanted to post some more information regarding my wildlife watching but I have been too busy to get my notes in order. Also I now have about ten books that I need to read. I think that I may just go into hibernation for a short while. As the weather has been frosty all day for most of the last week, hibernation looks like a great idea.




Sunday 16 December 2007

Beyond Kyoto and Bali


Just at the start of the Bali conference the BBC interviewed the chief scientific advisor to the white house on climate change. What he said was depressing, as it didn’t bode well for the climate change conference in Bali. What he said was that until the science can say at what level CO2 in the atmosphere was dangerous the US would not be doing anything that might damage the US economy.

When in Bali, Al Gore the former US Vice President, stood up and told the conference that he was ashamed of America. The attitude of the George W Bush government on climate change is shameful, shameful but honest. As the largest polluter the American government should be accepting that the American people need to stop the profligate waste of energy. But it’s only via this gorging of the energy resources that the US Economy makes its money.

The Stand off between the US and Europe created the illusion that Europe was being the good guy. Though the reality is that Europe has failed to meet its Kyoto targets just as much as any other country.

In Britain there is a lot of rhetoric but very little real action. Some action has been taken, promoting wind power, but very little else. We could have banned High Energy light bulbs, but this was consigned to the future.

Even in Europe action on climate change is always to be taken tomorrow and never today.

The problem is that we have thus far failed to see a real global event occur. While localised events are happening and acknowledged as being the result of Climate Change, until something dramatic happens the vast majority of people will not change their behaviour. For example all the protestors and lobbyist that went to Bali would have flown in, adding to CO2 pollution so that they could protest about CO2 pollution.

Personally I think the conference should have been held at the North Pole in summer, and they should not have been allowed back until an agreement on deep cuts was reached, or until the sea ice melted.

Bali and Kyoto before it have focused on the wrong problem. While CO2 is the measured green house gas, and a handy short hand for climate change, pollutants like nitrous oxide and water vapour are even more effective as greenhouse gasses. The whole Kyoto process is based upon the idea of continuing to pollute but slightly less. Its like telling an Alcoholic with impending liver failure that if you cut back on drinking everything will be all right.

There was a time when it looked as if we were going to run out of oil, but technology and new oil finds have extended the amount of available oil well into this century. Add to that the amount of coal globally and we have enough fossil fuel to last us about three hundred years. But if we burnt all that fossil fuel we would change the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere from the current four hundred parts per million to two thousand parts per million.

The seas would be dead as they would be to acid to support life beyond specialised bacteria, temperatures would be twenty to thirty degrees hotter, and mass extinctions will have occurred including Homo sapiens.

The IPCC recognises in its last report that feedback systems are probably in place in our climate but it will not be until we see them happening will we know for sure. The obvious one is the melting of the Sea Ice in the Artic. That is leading to the loss of the Greenland Ice sheet. The rise in seawater will then impact on the Western Antarctic Ice shelf causing this to break up adding to the rising sea levels, as well as affecting the flow of the Amazon River and flooding large areas of the rain forest, possibly killing off the planets lungs. The impacts of all these events would change the Monsoons in Africa and India, causing a severe drought.

In Europe we are already seeing the effect of a changing climate upon our food supplies. The rise in the price of wheat, while helping beleaguered farmers, is a direct result of poorer yields. This is not just a minor blip, but has been occurring for the last few years. In Europe the EU has sold all its stored wheat, as there has not been sufficient production in the past couple of years. This is not just happening in Europe but in America and Russia too.

All this means that climate change is already having an effect upon food supplies. So far all that most people will have noticed is an increase the price of food. In coming years we will see this effect exacerbated. Eventually there will be shortages of foods, especially for the poor.

We are facing stark choices, we cannot continue to burn fossil fuels and expect to have a planet fit to live on.

What is needed is leadership from and by America on climate change. What George W, or more realistically who ever replaces him, needs to announce the equivalent of the space race for tackling climate change. This must not just be for the benefit of the US but for the whole of humanity. Further this needs to involve all the countries and peoples of the planet. That way the US will no longer be seen as an arrogant imperialistic state it has become, but as part of the solution in helping to heal the planet.







Friday 14 December 2007

I wish I had been Wrong - Part One Melting Ice Caps


I know that I have been ridiculed for my predictions of an ecological disaster regarding climate change, and I have stuck my neck out and said that it will be happening in the next four to five years. Even amongst friends and acquaintances, people have said in veiled terms, that I must be mentally ill, paranoid and delusional. But while I hate to say it, I told you so!

The latest projections from scientists are that by the summer of 2013 we will loose the sea Ice in the Artic. This will devastate the species that rely upon this habitat like ring seals and polar bears and we are likely to see them become extinct in the wild in the next ten years.

Even the IPCC in their latest report say that it its too late and climate feedback systems are now operating expanding the effect of global warming. In the case of the Artic that means the darker seawater is absorbing more of the suns energy, warming the liquid water and speeding the melting of the Ice.

That is not the only feedback system that is operating in the Artic, as the loss of the sea ice is also warming the air temperatures and this is melting the glaciers on the Greenland Ice shelf.

While scientists may not want to be alarmist and don’t want to make predictions of a massive sea rise, I will. As when these glaciers do slip into the sea, I do say when and not if, there will be a rise is sea levels of about seven meters.

While at grass roots level there are people who care and understand the dangers, our political leaders are still hoping that a technical quick fix can be found. The difficulty is that our whole economic system is flawed. Therefore while this sudden upward swelling of sea levels will be a disaster for many millions of people, it will also be the wake up call that the world needs. This rise is inevitable as even if we stop burning all fossil fuels today, the melting of the sea ice and the glaciers will still happen.

It will only be via a disaster like this can we get all the worlds governments to stop worrying about all the trivial matters in the world and start to really develop an economic and energy system that is fair to all the peoples on the planet.

For example if half the money that were spent on military expenditure were put in to developing, manufacturing and installing Solar Photo Voltaic around the planet many of the problems that cause the instability and insecurity would be solved. This would also help developing countries provide their peoples with energy and essential services. Clean water is often not available to many peoples because there is no electricity to pump the water. The health of peoples in developing countries can often be vastly improved by providing electricity to health clinics and hospitals. None of this is rocket science either.

We could go further and in parts of the deserts like the Sahara, we could install banks of Photo Voltaic panels, enough to provide enough energy for all the counties in north Africa and provide them with an industry that will earn their economies the revenue they need to develop as well as providing Europe with some of its electricity with a minimal carbon impact. While this would cost large sums of money, if the money wasted on the building of the International Space station had been used for this project, we could have done this three times over.

While there will be some that will think that this will damage the desert ecology, not so, as climate change will render extinct ninety-nine percent of the species in the Sahara. Additional, with careful engineering, the solar panels can have a duel purpose as they can help capture the small amounts of water vapour in the air, condensing it on the panels, thus providing some of the water needs for people in these arid regions.

Equally, we could use geo-thermal energy. Iceland has developed the technology and all around the Pacific Rim we could help those countries to build plants and power stations using this low carbon energy. Again it would help developing countries without causing them to go down the route of heavily polluting coal or oil. Further, this would help these peoples to stop relying on cutting down their forests as the only real way of earning export income.

With this type of energy generation, it is not just the developing world that would benefit, as countries like Japan could provide fifty percent of its energy needs via Geo-thermal electricity production. All around the world we could generate from ten percent to twenty-five percent of the global energy needs from geo-thermal. Incidentally, if industries like aluminium smelting were relocated to these geo-thermal power plants, then as aluminium smelting is responsible for three percent of all the Carbon dioxide released globally, we would save over two billion tonnes of CO2 pollution.

These are all solutions that could be enacted today if there were the will. The trouble is while businesses are taking climate change seriously, most of the effort is going into developing ways of making money from the situation. What we need is to share skills and technology as by helping the developing world we also help save our own environments.




I wish I had been Wrong - Part Two Saturated Oceans


While in the previous section of this post I have shown that predictions of devastating climate change is now inevitable. I have also shown that there are potential solutions if we can find the will to act.

While the attention has been focused on the atmosphere as climate change has been allowed to creep on, it is in the oceans that drive the climate where real damage has been allowed to become so polluted that we have created the situation where we cannot stop climate change.

The seas are now saturated with CO2 that it cannot absorb much more. If we don’t start to take real action today the effects that are already going to occur will only be the devastating beginning of the extinction of the human race.

Thursday 13 December 2007

Books and Badgers


I have made no secret of my love for books here, they can provide some wonderful entertainment as well as information, and for me personally there have been books that have inspired me too. I may have mentioned before, hey the mouse repeats, there was one book, A Forest By Night by Fred Speakman, that inspired me to go badger watching when I was a child. Especially as the badgers he watched and recorded were in the same forest that was my stamping ground as a child.

Because of my own current watching activity, and my recent acquiring of a copy via the Internet, I have been rereading many of my books on badgers. I would love to get my paws on a copy of the New Naturalist Badger but as these books have become collectors items, I cant afford to buy a copy as copies of it are changing hands for three hundred pounds plus. That makes it frustrating for people like me who want to use the information rather than just own it as an investment. I do have many volumes from the New Naturalist series but I have them as tools for conservation.

Also, these books on wildlife have enabled me to understand what I should be looking for when I am out looking for wildlife, the type of habitat, the times that a species is active etc. However, sometimes what I see and experience is different from what the books would lead me to have expected. What happened last night is a perfect example of unexpected behaviour from my badgers.

I have previously spoken of the way that one sow, female badger, has musked me. That’s where she scent marks me with urine, it maybe what did for my previous boots.

With the freezing weather, watching the badgers has become a difficult and uncomfortable activity. While I normally position myself up a tree to watch the badgers, there is a hollow at the base of one tree that I have started to use as well. This is a warmer location but provides me with less visibility. I have had nights where I have only heard the badgers but not seen them clearly. The other night I knew there was a badger or two some ten feet or so from me, but in the dark shadows I could not be sure of what I was seeing, moving shadows, my eyes playing tricks on me, or were the badgers really sniffing at my feet.

Last night, while I was well wrapped up, I could see frost forming on my coat, as well as my legs. It has been so cold that I have taken a flask with me just to ensure that I don’t place myself at risk of incurring hypothermia. So last night I decided that I would have a hot drink and risk not seeing the badgers return, I had already seen them leave. I could hear them, but in the distance. So I was surprised when after I poured out some soup, I heard one of the badgers start to come closer. Its something that may surprise many people just how noisy the badgers are. Anyway, I think it was the smell they came to investigate.

I had the experience of having two young badgers, this years cubs, playing around me even occasionally running and jumping over my legs. That went on for a good forty minutes, then they both went off again.

My thoughts of going home returned and I poured another small cup of soup. I didn’t think it could get better and as I got ready to get up and move one of the young badgers returned. She was less boisterous and snuffled my boots and legs. I dropped a handful of peanuts for her and she made short work of them. Then she climbed onto my outstretched legs and settled down and went to sleep.

I couldn’t believe what was happening, her warmth was welcome but her weight did make my legs go numb. I think she stayed there for about half an hour, and only moved when she and I heard other badgers coming back to the sett.

What a remarkable experience, I had read of this type of interaction going on before with other experienced badger watchers, but I was sceptical, I never expected to experience anything like that myself.

When I finally stood up, it was clear where I had been sitting was clear as I had left a frost free patch on the ground. I will be stopping my nocturnal vigil for a while, but
I will be back watching my badgers again in the New Year.







A Sea of Wind Turbines


On Sunday John Hutton, the business secretary, announced that the UK government was planning a major expansion of offshore wind electricity generation. The irony that on that day the UK is being battered by high wind was not lost on me. I was also pleased to see that it was not the environment minister that was making the announcement. I was going to write about it on the day, but as I started looking at the details I realised that it looked less a definite plan than an aspiration.

First, to have this policy announced by someone other than the environment minister shows that the UK government is starting to take the issues of climate change seriously and that environmental considerations are permeating all aspects of government policy. There are other aspects of policy that are far from environmental, but this does sound as if in part at least the UK government appears to be taking the issues of climate change seriously. I say appears as while this policy and plan has been announced, the government expects private investment to create this massive engineering project.

What has been announced is that all around the UK coasts around seven hundred new turbines will be constructed, expanding our generating capacity to 38 giga watts. Unlike the positioning of wind turbines on the land these will be in positions where the turbines will fully benefit from the wind.

One of the problems of the current situation is where turbines are placed on the land; they are frequently sited near the infrastructure, to connect to the grid, rather than placed where they will benefit from the wind. All this is purely because of government grants and tax breaks, which subsidise the manufacturing and installation of these turbines, hence the companies positioning them are not basing their positioning decisions upon the need the need to generate the maximum electricity to make the turbines pay as they would if this were a purely commercial decision. Therefore creating opposition to wind power.

The difficulty with pensioning wind turbines off shore is quite a technical problem because of the difficulties of servicing the modules once installed, as well as the difficulties of building them. But one thing our off shore oil industry gave us was the skills to work in this hostile environment. The plans to involve building enough capacity to generate enough to power for every home in the UK, and that will mean about 7000 of these windmills. This will have the potential to either damage or enhance the marine environment.

As with any construction in the sea, there is the potential to damage the delicate marine habitats, be it reefs or sand banks or the spawning grounds of a multitude of species that inhabit our waters. Therefore the exact positioning of each structure needs to be carefully planed. After all destroying one environment to try and save another would leave a bitter taste in the mouth of many. However, the towers that have been installed thus far have produced mini reefs allowing many marine creatures a safe and expanded habitat.

All this could dramatically reduce the carbon impact of electricity generation, while it is true that manufacturing and installation will generate a carbon footprint, at least the positioning of these turbines offshore will ensure the turbines will be placed where they will operate most efficiently. The will also be the need for other forms of generation as turbines only generate power when the wind is blowing. Also these windmills cannot generate power in very high winds.

However, on the whole all this could reduce the climatic impact and carbon footprint for future generations.

While I have reservations about the environmental impact of this on the marine environment, on the whole I am in favour of this plan if it ever becomes a reality.




Tuesday 11 December 2007

Is there hope for Polar Bears in a Fossil?



It used to be that the scientific community would couch their arguments on climate change with comments that “It appears…” or “the models indicate…” or other such caveats so that they didn’t appear alarmist. There is a new sense of urgency in the scientific community as the predictions of the climate models are coming to fruition thirty and forty years ahead of what the models expected. This is even more pronounced in the Artic and Antarctic. Even some of the most sceptical sat up and took notice when the Larson B ice shelf disintegrated in only a few months.

When this area of sea ice, the area of Cornwall, broke away from the Antarctic, suddenly climate change switched from being something that could or would occur in the future, but became something that’s happening now.

While many people have been trying to raise awareness of the very real threat of this, our voices have been drowned out by the noise of the hot air of they nay Sayers.

The new scientific reports on climate change are having to revise forward the dates when certain events are expected to occur. The most noticeable is the loss of the summer sea ice at the artic. This year the volume and area of Sea Ice, matched what was predicted in climate models it to be by the year 2050.

While I could tell you of the implications of this for our climate, it is the effect upon two important species that rely upon the Sea Ice that is really alarming. With a reduction in the size of the habitat, the ring seal population will eventually fall to about thirty-five to forty percent of existing numbers. This will impact even more on the numbers of Polar Bears.

While the discovery of this part of a jawbone of an ancient Polar bear shows that they could have survived a previous inter-glacial period, the fact remains that polar bears will loose ninety-five percent of their territory when the sea ice disappears. Further, while some may be lucky and find themselves stranded on some of the islands dotted around the Artic, unless they have a food source, i.e. Ring Seals, they will still die off.

While I would love this discovery to be a source of hope, I don’t see it as much of one.


The News Story Here.



My thanks to WWF for the image

Monday 10 December 2007

A Comment on Comments

I would like to make a quick comment on the comments I get here. I fully welcome any comment or criticism; sometimes they have highlighted errors that I have made. Further, I know that some people out there in Webland think I am eccentric or just plain stupid, but the problem is with the language that is used to say that.

With this Blog and its previous incarnation on Yahoo, I apply settings so that I can reject or publish a comment. Personally I would like to publish all of them, but when people place comments that are offensive of full of strong profanities, I can’t justify allowing them. So if you want to call me all sorts of names, fine but do it with the English language, preferably not anonymously either so that others can see how childish you are really being.

While the Internet is a wonderful forum for debate and ideas, it is tiresome to keep on getting abuse from people who lack the brain cells to out smart a monkey.




Sunday 9 December 2007

Bullfinch



The other morning after spending another night under the stars watching the badgers, I decided that I would go to a particular spot where I stood a good chance of seeing the Roe Deer. As I was already cold, a bone numbing cold, I knew that while I waited and watched I would have some shelter from the wind. Unfortunately the Deer failed to make an appearance, I suspect that as I was shivering so much that I was failing to be as quiet as I thought I was. Therefore, I failed again to get the pictures I was hoping for.

Because I was so cold I decided to head for one of the bird hides, where at least I would be out of the wind that was draining the warmth from my body. It worked wonders for me, as although tired, I was delighted to see the flocks of birds, particularly the Bullfinches that were using this feeding station.

My initial pictures were a little blurred as I was still shivering a bit, but as I warmed up I was able to keep the camera still to get some cracking shots.

This stop on my sojourn home was welcome as I was able to regain some of my body heat, and I had some good memories to take home with me. When I finally got to bed, I slept for a full twelve hours straight. While watching any wildlife nocturnally has its problems, one of my problems has been solved by the gift I was given of a pen that has a red LED light in it so that I can see to take notes without disturbing the badgers and foxes.

It’s rather funny but several people have asked me why study an animal like the Badger, don’t we already know about them? Well as I will be showing in a latter posting, no we don’t and it’s only from real observations can we really learn.



Stock Dove


Often mistaken for a feral pigeon this bird is still not that common. This one has probably travelled south from Scotland, although I could not tell if it had an accent. Locally, the Wood pigeon is the dominant species, so finding a Stock Dove is a rare treat.

While wood pigeons are a serious pest of farm crops, stock doves tend to rely on seeds from wild plants. In the past the flocks of wood pigeon were so vast that they could devastate a farmers grain crop, but following the second world war, with numbers seriously reduced, populations of birds like Stock Doves were able to repopulate areas that they been displaced from by the Wood pigeon.

The problem started with the changes in agriculture back in the 1700s. The enclosures of traditional strip farming lands, while improving yields for human consumption, also enabled the wood pigeon to increase in numbers. This helped displace other species like Stock Doves and Turtle Doves. It was not until the Second World War when food supplies were under stress that action was finally taken to control the wood pigeon, were the government paid for the ammunition to shoot them. As will as supplementing the diet, this enabled farmers to finally reduce the population of a serious pest species.

All this had the other benefit of providing the space in the ecology that allowed the numbers of Stock dove and Turtledoves to recover. Also, it created the additional benefit of allowing the collard dove to introduce its self in to Britain in the 1950s.

While the wood pigeon is still a numerous pest, its numbers are nowhere near as high as they were at the turn of the twentieth century. While the actions taken to control them were not designed as conservation measures, they did benefit the environment.

It is only when we see birds like the Stock Dove can we see the effect of measures taken years ago.






Saturday 8 December 2007

Angle Shades Moth



The other morning returning, doing my impression of an icicle, from a night of watching the badgers, I noticed this Angle Shades moth that had settled on the doorframe of my shed. It’s actually what used to be the out house and colloquially known as a “Netty”. What is unusual is that this moth should be in hibernation but while the weather is cold, it is still warm enough for this insect to still be active.







Friday 7 December 2007

A Changing Climate around the World

I know that most of the people that read the mouse’s Blog think that I must be a fruitcake and a doom seer, with my predictions of the coming climate change catastrophe. But my predictions are not the visions of a crazed lunatic; they are based soundly on the scientific data available to all. The real problem is that far to many people choose to ignore what is really happening to our climate and our environment, further they assume that as nothing disastrous has happened yet, a climate change disaster must just be a myth.

This attitude is not helped by all the vested interests. People who stand to loose out financially when we are all finally forced to take action to cope with this changed and changing climate.

Even with streets and roads choked with fumes and clogged with traffic, people refuse to give up their cars. But what’s worse, people insist on buying and driving a vehicle that’s much larger than they need and consequently costs more to run. The attitude seems to be that if they can afford to run an inefficient vehicle they will. All this leads to cars that emit more CO2 than is needed.

But its not just cars, I have lost count of the people that I have meet who on the surface are very committed environmentalists, but given the chance of a cheap flight or holiday overseas, principals evaporate as quickly as a jet produces Nitrous oxide and water vapour, both potent and long lasting greenhouse gases.

I keep on looking around me and around the world and wonder if its me? Am I the only one that can see the very real effects of Climate change going on? That question is a rhetorical one, as I know that I am not alone but I do feel like a lone voice in the wilderness.

To give you all a round up: In Australia there has been a drought going on for ten years. While large areas of Australia are deserts, it is the impact of a changing climate that has caused this drought.

In Georgia and other neighbouring states in the south east US there is a drought that has affected towns and cities like Atlanta and Birmingham, Alabama where all their water is coming from the same source.

In the Great Lakes region, the water level in Lake Superior is two feet lower than it should be. As each inch represents five hundred billion gallons of water, that’s one point two trillion gallons of water lost as vapour into the atmosphere, with all that water vapour adding to the greenhouse effect.

The forest fires that raged in California were as a direct result of a climate change induced drought. The list could go on, but it’s in the real wilderness places that the effect is most dramatic. The loss of the summer ice at the North Pole has been well reported. But what is less well known is that this level of melting of the sea ice was not expected until 2050. While all the computer models for the climate were predicting this to happen, it has occurred forty years earlier than expected.

While the global average increase in temperatures has only been just over one degree Celsius in two places its four and five degrees. In Japan temperatures are now five degrees higher than they were ten years ago and that has been constant for the past five years. In Southern Spain temperatures are four degrees higher and droughts there have exhausted the aquifers (underground water stored in rocks) to such an extent that salts are now leaching out and poisoning the land.

While each of these impacts are happening in local regions the effect has a global implication. The problem is that because these effects of climate change are occurring locally, they are all parts off a much larger image of global warming.

We already have gone past the point of no return and while governments argue about setting limits to how much we can be allowed to pollute our nest, none of the decisions made in Bali will stop what is already happening. It is in fact down to all of us to take action. Each little action will help.

Firstly we need to stop wasting energy; turning off lights, appliances and turning down the heating.

Further, we need to stop travelling, there are some journeys that are essential, going to work etc but there will be someone you can share your car with on at least some of your trips. However, the most important action must be to stop flying. While aircraft produce only four percent of the global CO2, the Nitrous Oxide and the water vapour generated are magnifying the greenhouse effect as the gasses are released in the upper atmosphere, just where it needs to be to warm the planet.

Water is the key to life on this planet. The human animal cannot survive more than three days without it, yet we are failing to take the global water crisis seriously. We all need to save water, act as though we all are living in an arid region and that water costs more than gold. In a few years it may well become that precious.

Our climate has gone into a feedback system; our climate is and will change. We can’t stop it now, but we can work on reducing the way it impacts the lives of our kith and kin.

I hope to be able to bring you news and information of what people are actually doing to help themselves, and to help the planet. At times I have felt that I am utterly alone in trying to live in an environmentally responsible way, so I hope that here we can all share ideas and information about the way we can all help heal the scars inflicted upon our home planet.





Wednesday 5 December 2007

The Lakes that should not be there - Nepal Lakes



In the Himalayas a series of lakes have formed over the last twenty years. What is most extraordinary is that these lakes should not exist at all as they should be glaciers. They occupy the areas where the glaciers have retreated from, just like Imja Glacier Lake.

As the glaciers melt and are retreating via climate change, Imja Lake is a curse and a blessing. The blessing is that the glacier deposited the screed and rock debris just in front of where the lake formed, thus slowing down the flow of melt water off of the mountain. Therefore protecting the villages and populations from flooding, mudslides and devastation. However it is also a curse as the volume of this lake six thousand feet above sea level is growing. Already a kilometre long and one hundred meters wide it is growing, in length, by a further hundred meters per year.

While on this Lake a sluice gate has been added to control the flow and volume of water, this is only one of hundreds of new lakes that the retreating of the glaciers has created. All of these lakes are at serious risk of collapse, releasing billions of litres upon unsuspecting millions of people.

While attention has quite rightly been focused on the risks of a rise in sea level, we have all missed this looming disaster. If one lake fails it will have a domino effect causing a whole series lakes to fail. This could be a natural disaster that dwarfs the impact of the Boxing Day Tsunami.

I have long been perplexed by the relatively small rise in sea levels as a result of climate change. I am now beginning to understand where all this water is. Because we do have a warmer climate around the globe more of our water has disappeared into the atmosphere, warmer air holds more water. All this is going to lead to a sudden and dramatic environmental and weather event that really will shock everyone into really taking notice of climate change.

It is now to late to prevent the looming catastrophe, millions of people will be killed as a result of this, billions will be made homeless and without food or water. When this dramatic rise in sea levels occurs it will not only effect people in the developing world but every nation will be affected, none of us will escape the impact of this event.

While it will look as though it is a natural disaster, it will be a man made disaster.




Tuesday 4 December 2007

Great Tit


On a lighter note and to remind us all why saving the planet is so important, here’s a Great Tit.






Save the Cow, Save The World

Recently the militant vegetarian organisations, Viva, were saying that the way to solve Climate Change was to stop eating meat and to switch to a completely vegetarian diet.

As I used to be a vegetarian I wanted to look at the data, as it seemed that if what they were saying was correct then I may have missed something. However, while I some sympathy for what they are saying, I do feel that we do eat to much meat, the science is not only flawed it is wrong. Further, they are trying to push their animal rights agenda on the back of climate change. Also while anyone changing their diet to a vegetarian one will not do themselves any harm, the organisation, Viva, will harm the environment as anyone following their agenda will be distracted from the actions that really need to be taken.

At the heart of their claim is the myth regarding the methane that cattle and ruminants produce. More than once in the media here in the UK, mainly the tabloid press it has to be said, Climate Change has been blamed on farting cows. While it is true that bovines produce methane as part of their digestive process, most of it is released via belching. Further while methane is twenty times stronger as a greenhouse gas than Carbon dioxide, it doesn’t stay in the atmosphere.

If this was the cause for Climate change then when the buffalo herds were slaughtered in the North American plains then we should have suffered a global cooling. Also we used to use horses as the main form of motive and agricultural power and again they produce methane too. The simple fact is that while there is to much methane released into the atmosphere, it is not the cause or a major contributor to climate change. Any methane released today will be lost to the vacuum of space in five to ten years.

The difficulty with the approach that Viva want is that if everyone did stop eating meat, there would then be sixty billion animals extra to feed. That’s how many are killed for food each year. I suspect that if there was a great change in diet from meat that these animals would suffer. Also good traditional agricultural practice needs the manure and waste from livestock to fertilise the land to produce the vegetated crops. Without animal fertilisers then more polluting artificial fertilisers would be used.

What I find frustrating with so many of these organisations that are trying to push their agenda is that they miss the point. We all need to drastically change what we do. These organisations fool people into thinking that if they just do that one thing they will be doing all they can. However, we all need to do many things. We need to always think about the environmental impact of everything we do.

Also we do need to be cynical about the companies and businesses that are trying to “sell” us their product(s) as the solution. Nor should we allow ourselves be fooled by green-washing, companies that claim to be acting environmentally but are only doing what looks good. Its like Airlines who claim they are carbon offsetting, while planting trees and taking other measures to mitigate the carbon dioxide is useful, it is not the solution. The only real solution is to stop adding to the CO2 in the atmosphere by stopping consuming and only travelling when needed.




Herbal Tea



Now I have no idea if anyone but me reads the comments that you good folk leave, there are a few people that I need to contact because of what you folks do say. But, I thought I would highlight something I was sent today by a Musty Meles meles.

Why do anarchists only ever drink herbal tea?




















Because all proper tea is theft. (Groan)

That’s nearly as bad as one of my jokes!

The picture is of the Badger Man making the tea, anyone for a cup of chamomile?






Monday 3 December 2007

Good News Bad News



When this Mouse switched on his computer this morning, there were two news stories that caused my whiskers to twitch. The first was that Kevin Rudd the new Australian prime minister had as his first action after being sworn in has ratified (signed) the Kyoto Protocol. That leaves only the US as the only major developed country not to have signed the treaty.

All this is happening just as government representatives are meeting in Bali to discus what follows Kyoto. While it is taking time, little by little, politicians around the world are finally taking the issues of climate change seriously. I have even noticed that in the media they are no longer referring to the process as Global Warming, but are calling it Climate Change. As calling it global warming makes it sound like a jolly nice thing to happen, I am glad to see that the media is finally taking the matter seriously.

Then I came across this story:

An investigation has revealed that some airlines are flying longer routes to avoid paying higher Air Traffic Control fees. In doing so they are burning (Wasting) more Fuel and creating an extra three tones of CO2 per flight. That’s six extra tones for each aircraft in every round trip, all this to save a whopping ninety-nine pounds sterling.

The airlines in question say that they do it to maintain schedules, but if the Air Traffic Controllers didn’t have to adjust flight and holding patterns to accommodate aircraft like these coming in via the back door, there would be no delays.

Until we have people and industries thinking and acting in an environmentally responsible way, we all face the effects of the irresponsible.



Sunday 2 December 2007

Wandering Albatross Diomedea exulans



When I was a child, as a family we only ever had two holidays. The first was on the Norfolk Broads and even though I would only have been about seven, I was excited by the sights of the bird life that I saw, especially the Herons and the Egrets that were all new to me. Further, I heard a haunting sound that I now know was the booming sound of a Bitten calling. Something that even now, is a really rare sound, seeing the Bitten is even more rare and I know many experienced birders who have never seen one.

The Second holiday was at Dawlish Warren near the Ex Estuary and by this time I was thirteen and able to appreciate the countryside and environment that was at this location. None of my family shared my love of natural history but fortunately I was able to garner the time to go off on my own and explore the mudflats. It was an amazing experience to just watch the waders and seabirds that I had never seen before.

Some of the birds I knew from books, some I didn’t. One that I had not seen before was a Wandering Albatross. Then I had no idea of just how rare my sighting was, and I had no idea that I could or should have reported seeing this bird. It was only a couple of years later when I became a member of the RSPB did I discover that there had been other unconfirmed reports of this Albatross being seen. Also it should be noted that this was in 1976 when the summer was remarkably hot and dry, and with hindsight, the weather and the unusual sightings were some of the first signs of a changing climate.

This experience prompted me to do two things, the first was to start saving up from doing a paper round for an SLR camera, the second was to start seriously looking at learning what I could about what I saw.

With the Albatross all I really knew was the ancient mariner poem and the bit about water and not a drop to drink. But the memory of seeing this bird with such an enormous wingspan has always stayed with me.

Therefore I was surprised to hear that we are loosing so many of these birds, as I couldn’t imagine what could we be doing to drastically reduce the population. The answer was that in tackling one conservation problem we had inadvertently generated another one.

Long line fishing had been seen as a much more sustainable way of fishing than trawling nets when catching species like Tuna. Frequently dolphins and proposes were also caught in the nets. As an air-breathing Mammal they were being drowned in the nets. Therefore fishermen were persuaded to go back to the traditional long line methods. The difficulty was that after years of trawling, the fishermen had lost the skills.

The older traditional fishermen would weight the hooks so they disappeared quickly so that birds like the albatross couldn’t snatch the bait. Also the older and more experienced fishermen would trail flags or banners from the back of the boat to keep the birds away. However the fishermen who returned to this form of long line fishing with lines of baited hooks some as long as one hundred kilometres, have lost the skills and it is now the albatrosses that were being drowned. Therefore organisations like the RSPB and Bird Life International have to re-educate the fishermen in the old skills.

As the albatross is such a long-lived bird, living to fifty odd years, they only reach sexual maturity at twelve to fourteen years. They also have slow reproductive cycle, laying only one egg per pair and only breeding every two to three years. Any sustainable losses will decimate the population. The fact is that in the last twenty years the population has halved and is decline at one percent per year.

The problem here was not the solution that saved the dolphins and proposes, but the fact that instead of using lines that were three or four miles long, but using lines that were more than ten times the length that were traditionally used.

Personally as Tuna is endangered itself anyway, I don’t buy or eat it. By not eating it we may help save the Albatross.



My thanks go to Lex van Groningen and Bird Life International for the stunning image of the Albatross







Business as usual for Bush on Climate Change

One of the greatest difficulties for all of us in our attempts to tackle climate change is the lack of political leadership, especially from the largest polluters. While not the largest population the change of leadership in Australia will be good news in tackling climate pollution.

However while US president Bush has finally been acknowledging that climate change is a problem, events this week shows that the Bush Government intends to do nothing to reduce the Carbon-dioxide emissions from the US. Here in the UK, in the Financial Times, the leading business and financial publication, a conglomerate of international businesses, in a two-page advert, called for leadership in dealing with climate change. The response from the white house was simple, the US will not do anything to cap CO2 emissions and it, the bush government, can not even say when the US will be able to start reducing its carbon footprint.

The science and the evidence is so compelling now that, international business people realise that real action has to be taken. The difficulty is that unless the US, the largest economy in the world, takes political action and tackles climate change then business can’t plan for the investment in a low carbon future.

While there are some businesses that are making the effort, if we have a large economy like the US that refuses to impose regulation, then those businesses will loose money and or profits. Put simply the people that make the effort will always be undercut by the most polluting countries. In some ways this problem is similar to the way that manufacturing has chased the low wages in china. However, unlike this chasing of low wages, governments like the US allowing carbon pollution to occur will kill all industry.

The greatest problem is that oil men like Bush see climate change as an advantage as it is allowing access to the vast oil and gas deposits that are untapped in the artic circle. Further, the US Japan China and the EU are all looking to the probability of mining helium three on the moon, as a new wonder fuel. That is why there is a new moon race and why so many countries are rushing to land men on the moon again. The carbon footprint from these enterprises are vast and will mean that we will seriously damage our climate in trying to obtain this new fuel for an unproven technology.

Further, the US bush government; in particular, assume that the loss of the sea ice will not be that serious for the climate. However that is based upon a false assumption and reliant upon out of date science. In the last five years the unexpected acceleration in the melting of the sea ice has allowed the Greenland Ice cap to start melting. It is loosing up to 150 cubic kilometres of melt water per year. Further this is increasing and this water is flowing into the sea.

Also the Greenland Ice Cap is suffering from cracks and crevices opening up on the suffice of this vast glacier. This means that lakes of melt water that form in the summer are draining down to the bedrock where it is lubricating the flow of the Ice. But this melt water doesn’t re-freeze during the winter as just as happens in a pond or lake the ice on top insulates the water and stops it from freezing. All this is making the three kilometre thick glacier that is the Greenland Ice Cap very unstable.

It will not take a lot for this ice to break up. Scientists are monitoring the Ice and recording the vibrations of the cracking up of this glacier, known as Ice quakes, they occur every twenty minutes. There is an inevitability that sooner rather than later there will be a large area of this glacier will calf and slip into the sea. This will raise sea levels.

Further, any sizeable earthquake nearby could provide the trigger to allow very sizeable chunks of the Ice cap to slide into the sea. This could trigger Tidal waves as well as a sudden and substantial rise in sea levels. What makes this scenario even more disturbing is that the trigger is already in place. Mount St Helens in the US, an active volcano has a bulging plug in its calderas, and when that blows, the quakes and vibrations from that could well be all that it takes to see the glacier slip into the sea.

This is not something that will happen in some mythical time years hence, but within the next four to five years. I just hope that when it happens it finally shocks the US government into taking action on climate change.

I make a clear distinction here between the American people who want action taken on climate change and the Government who have their head in the sand.