data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c23b7/c23b77f09677f9b1a22fb2e86a14fe4823b6eeae" alt=""
As my long suffering readers know, I do have taste when it comes to choosing the places where I live. As this picture taken before the snows shows.
Naturalist at Large
Following on from my previous posting a bit and the comments made by Tonya, got me thinking about the way that some folks react to competition. In my Village there is an Independent store and when I first moved to the village, it was very good. It was then sold and the new owner seemed to lack the understanding of what made it work. Dropping many of the lines and services that drew customers in. So now it is just like any corner shop that you can find anywhere.
But the one action that really perplexed me was when the newsagent was taken under new ownership too and started selling a few grocery items. The owner of the village store took the silly action of starting to sell newspapers. Now both are likely to fail as businesses as all they have done is split the trade.
At markets, craft fairs and farmers markets (over here), I so often see this “me too” attitude where traders see someone doing well and starting to do the same things. Why? I personally think it would be better to do a few things well, than trying to copy what everyone else is doing.
Equally, I do not fear competition, even if others came along selling herbs and spices, it is the service and quality that helps me win customers. Additionally as I mix my own blends, even if someone were to copy me, I doubt that they would match what I am doing. Often though I have seen folks at fairs and markets just complaining about competition.
Now it may well be that the reason their stuff is not selling is that it is not appealing to the customer. Often at craft fairs in particular, crafter's produce items that they seem to think will earn money because they have seen similar items in shops that are made cheaply in China. An example is door number plaques. I see them so often that there must be two for every house in Britain.
Equally, at Farmers markets I see organic vegetables that are over priced and not the best quality. The sellers often fall back on the old mantra of “Its Organic”. Well organic they may be, but poor quality vegetables are still poor quality, organic or not. And I say this as a fan of organic produce, and good organic Vegetables are better than chemically grown ones. Put simply they do taste better, and I am not talking about appearance either. As a sometimes gardener, I can see what is good quality and what should have gone for compost.
However, at the best markets, there is not these problems as the quality is good, there is diversity and specialists crate great items. I love good farmers markets for discovering something different and some great food. If I had the money, I would love to buy my furniture from the great makers that you can find.
I think often with markets it is the attitude of the sellers that makes folks want to return and buy. If the sellers have a good positive attitude the potential customers pick up on that feeling.
I know that markets, of any type, are hard work. I also know that if a seller is not making sales it can be dispiriting, but personally I often see the lack of sales as a way of understanding what people don’t want as much what customers do want. So I wish good luck to Tonya and anyone else trying to sell at farmers markets or any other market.
As this issue is far to important to remain hidden, I am responding to the comment Ms Tree made to my previous posting with a follow up posting.
I am aware that the oil could reach British shores. The simple fact is that this has already become the largest oil spill in US history, and the larger the volume of oil from any spill, the greater the chance that it will impact other shores. That could include Britain. Such is the nature of environmental pollution. Pollution does not respect the political boundaries, it just follows the wind or sea currents.
Also I am aware that people cleaning up the oil need to be trained. After all if they don't know what they are doing they may cause more harm and may damage themselves if they are not trained. The point I was trying to make was that BP were trying to keep independent eyes from seeing what was really happening. When Exxon dealt with the spill in Alaska, they steam cleaned the beach and the rocks. This created the illusion that the beach was free of oil but in fact the steam drove the tars under the surface. Therefore creating the illusion of a good clean beach, rocks, shore while sterilising the shore of all life and hiding the problem. This is exactly what BP was trying to do.
If no independent eyes were there to see oiled and dead birds, BP could try and claim that the impact was far less than had been feared. Just the same as BP tried to do regarding the out flowing of the oil. BP claimed that it was five thousand barrels per day. Yet the US Geological survey says its forty thousand barrels per day. To put that into context that's two million litres per day, every day for three months.
I fully agree with Ms Tree that this is a travesty and I have equally avoided posting about this as too feel extremely angry about this. It has taken me a while before I felt that I had enough accurate information so I could post something meaningful.
One aspect that should not go without being commented on, the area of the spill is the breading ground for the Blue Fin Tuna. This is a species that is already seriously endangered, and over fishing of immature fish (By Europe and Japan) is already preventing breeding of the fish. The spill has occurred just as the Tuna had been laying their eggs. The oil will kill at least seventy percent of the eggs and fry. What is most upsetting about this is the efforts of the US within the Gulf of Mexico was really the last and only hope that the Blue Fin Tuna and the Yellow Fin Tuna would not become extinct. It appears that we can say good bye to sushi as a direct result of this spill.
As I write I am now hearing on the radio that the oil leaking from the well head is in fact sixty thousand barrels per day. And while I do understand that the costs of sorting out this mess will impact the pensions of normal people, especially if the costs drain BP of cash. But had more people been much more concerned about ethics then they would never have invested in companies that abuse people and human rights, as BP does in Nigeria. And regularly pollutes, again as happens regularly in places like Nigeria. Therefore BP has to pay for the cost of cleaning this mess up.
This accident was predictable, and had it been a terrorist action I doubt that people would be any less angry. BP actions across the globe shows that they have a very poor attitude to safety and the environment and had it not been that America is a developed country would have happened much sooner.
While BP is supposed to be a British company, half the shareholders are in fact American. But in reality it is a global company that has no loyalty to any state or nation and only cares about making money. It was this attitude to making money at all costs that caused this, so if BP falls I will not be shedding any tears for it.
powered by Inteliture.com . |